Mazda 6 2012 vs Volvo V70 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Mazda 6 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V70 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 145 - 192 HP | 115 - 304 HP | |
Torque: | 210 - 420 NM | 240 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | 6.9 - 11.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.4 | 4.5 - 10.2 | |
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V70. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
Mazda 6 is smaller. Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 575 litres | |
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Mazda 6 has 73 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V70. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`038 | ~ 2`293 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 7400 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |