Mazda 6 2012 vs Volvo V70 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Volvo V70
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda 6 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V70 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.51.6 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 145 - 192 HP115 - 304 HP
Torque: 210 - 420 NM240 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 - 10.2 seconds6.9 - 11.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 6.44.5 - 10.2
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V70. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.82 m
Width: 1.84 m1.86 m
Height: 1.48 m1.55 m
Mazda 6 is smaller.
Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 502 litres575 litres
Volvo V70 has more luggage space.
Mazda 6 has 73 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V70.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`038~ 2`293
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 74007200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Volvo V70 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv