Mazda 6 2012 vs Mazda 626 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 - 192 HP | 100 - 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 420 NM | 152 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | 9.3 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.4 | 5.2 - 8.9 | |
|
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger. Mazda 6 is 19 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 12 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 502 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`038 | ~ 1`648 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |