Mazda 6 2012 vs Mazda 6 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Mazda 6 2012 is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda 6 2015 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 145 - 192 HP | 145 - 192 HP | |
Torque: | 210 - 420 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.4 | 4.4 - 6.4 | |
On average, the Mazda 6 2012 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda 6 2015. On average, Mazda 6 2012 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2015. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2012 and Mazda 6 2015 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 522 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1664 litres | |
Mazda 6 2012 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6 2015. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2012 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 6 2015, which means Mazda 6 2012 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`038 | ~ 2`074 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 6600 | 8800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |