Mazda 6 2012 vs Volvo V60 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda 6 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 - 192 HP | 115 - 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 420 NM | 240 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | 6.2 - 12.7 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo V60 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 6. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.4 | 4.5 - 10.2 | |
|
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V60. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 17 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 72 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`038 kg | ~ 2`129 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`381 kg | ~ 1`591 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 657 kg | ~ 538 kg | |
| Mazda 6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Volvo V60. Therefore, Mazda 6 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V60 is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |