Mazda 6 2002 vs Volvo S60 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Volvo S60
2000 - 2004
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda 6 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.32.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 120 - 166 HP130 - 300 HP
Torque: 165 - 310 NM192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 11.8 seconds5.7 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 9.16.5 - 13.0
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.58 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Mazda 6 is 9 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 492 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 68 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 2.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`896~ 2`030
Safety:
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 10001600
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv