Mazda 6 2002 vs Mazda 6 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.3 | 1.8 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 166 HP | 120 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 310 NM | 165 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 11.8 seconds | 9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 9.1 | 6.0 - 8.9 | |
|
Mazda 6 2002 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6 2005. On average, Mazda 6 2002 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2002 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 6 2005, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 492 litres | 492 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1662 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`896 | ~ 1`946 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |