Mazda 6 2002 vs Honda Accord 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Honda Accord
2001 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel)1.8 (petrol)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 6 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 120 - 166 HP136 HP
Torque: 165 - 310 NM175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 11.8 seconds11.1 - 12.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 9.18.6 - 9.5
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.60 m
Width: 1.78 m1.75 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 7 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 492 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`896no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Honda Accord has
  • only petrol engines available
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv