Mazda 6 2002 vs Ford Mondeo 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.31.8 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 120 - 166 HP90 - 226 HP
Torque: 165 - 310 NM165 - 360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 11.8 seconds7.5 - 12.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 9.15.7 - 10.7
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.73 m
Width: 1.78 m1.81 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 492 litres500 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1370 litres
Mazda 6 has 8 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`896~ 1`934
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10001000
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
Ford Mondeo has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv