Mazda 6 2002 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.3 | 1.3 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 166 HP | 84 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 310 NM | 122 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 11.8 seconds | 9 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 9.1 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 6 is 22 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 492 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 878 litres | |
| Mazda 6 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`896 | ~ 1`728 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 3 has
| |