Mazda 6 2002 vs BMW 3 series 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2005
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda 6 is available only with front wheel drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.31.8 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 120 - 166 HP105 - 231 HP
Torque: 165 - 310 NM165 - 410 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 11.8 seconds6.5 - 14 seconds
In general, BMW 3 series are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 6. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 9.15.5 - 11.0
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.47 m
Width: 1.78 m1.74 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Mazda 6 is larger.
Mazda 6 is 20 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 492 litres440 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 52 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.8 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 1`896 kg~ 1`964 kg
Net weight:~ 1`358 kg~ 1`460 kg
Load capacity:~ 538 kg~ 504 kg
Safety:
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 10002400
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv