Mazda 6 2010 vs Mazda 6 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 180 HP | 120 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 400 NM | 165 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 11.7 seconds | 8.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.0 | 5.6 - 8.1 | |
|
Mazda 6 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6 2008. On average, Mazda 6 2010 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2008. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2010 and Mazda 6 2008 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | 1702 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2010 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 6 2008, which means Mazda 6 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`021 | ~ 2`016 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |