Mazda 6 2010 vs Honda Accord 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 180 HP | 150 - 268 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 400 NM | 192 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 11.7 seconds | 7.9 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.0 | 5.6 - 8.8 | |
|
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Mazda 6 and Honda Accord are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 467 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda Accord. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`021 | ~ 1`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
| |