Mazda 6 2010 vs Honda Accord 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Honda Accord
2007 - 2011
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.52.0 - 3.5

Performance

Power: 120 - 180 HP150 - 268 HP
Torque: 165 - 400 NM192 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 - 11.7 seconds7.9 - 10.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 8.05.6 - 8.8
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.76 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Mazda 6 and Honda Accord are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres467 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1702 litresno data
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda Accord.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`021~ 1`995
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 40004000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv