Mazda 6 2010 vs Ford Mondeo 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Ford Mondeo
2010 - 2014
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.6 - 2.2

Performance

Power: 120 - 180 HP115 - 240 HP
Torque: 165 - 400 NM159 - 420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 - 11.7 seconds7.5 - 12.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 8.05.3 - 7.9
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.78 m
Width: 1.80 m1.89 m
Height: 1.44 m1.50 m
Mazda 6 is smaller.
Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres486 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1702 litres1390 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 6 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The Ford Mondeo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 312 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`021~ 2`173
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

low
Average price (€): 42005200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv