Mazda 6 2010 vs Ford Mondeo 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 - 180 HP | 115 - 240 HP | |
Torque: | 165 - 400 NM | 159 - 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 11.7 seconds | 7.5 - 12.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.0 | 5.3 - 7.9 | |
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.50 m | |
Mazda 6 is smaller. Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 486 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | 1390 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 6 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The Ford Mondeo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 312 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`021 | ~ 2`173 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | low | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | 5000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
| |