Mazda 6 2010 vs Mazda 3 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 120 - 180 HP105 - 167 HP
Torque: 165 - 400 NM145 - 270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 - 11.7 seconds10.4 - 13.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.2 - 8.04.3 - 8.2
On average, the Mazda 6 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda 3. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)119 - 155 mm (4.7 - 6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.58 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.47 m
Mazda 6 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 6 is 18 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1702 litresno data
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`021~ 1`794
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 42005000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv