Mazda 6 2010 vs Mazda 3 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda 6 is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 180 HP | 116 - 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 400 NM | 150 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 11.7 seconds | 9.3 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.0 | 4.1 - 8.3 | |
|
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 30 cm longer than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 569 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1702 litres | 1019 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 59 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 683 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`021 | ~ 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |