Mazda 6 2018 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 - 194 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 - 445 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.8 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger. Mazda 6 is 43 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 187 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 164 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`111 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |