Mazda 6 2018 vs Subaru Outback 2017

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2018 -
Subaru Outback
2017 -
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticAutomatic
Mazda 6 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Subaru Outback is available only with automatic gearbox.
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda 6 is available with front wheel drive, while Subaru Outback can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)2.5 - 3.6 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 145 - 250 HP175 - 260 HP
Torque: 213 - 445 NM235 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 - 10.1 seconds7.6 - 10.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 9.07.7 - 9.9
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Outback.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.88 m4.82 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.45 m1.68 m
Mazda 6 is 6 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 is 23 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 489 litres512 litres
Subaru Outback has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 23 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 12 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1 metres more than that of the Subaru Outback, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`066~ 2`115
Safety:
Subaru Outback scores higher in safety tests. The Subaru Outback scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 24 80026 400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • both manual and automatic
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Subaru Outback has
  • automatic transmission only
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • only petrol engines available
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv