Mazda 6 2018 vs Subaru Outback 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
| Mazda 6 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Subaru Outback is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda 6 is available with front wheel drive, while Subaru Outback can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.5 - 3.6 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 6 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 - 250 HP | 175 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 - 445 NM | 235 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.1 seconds | 7.6 - 10.2 seconds | |
| In general, Subaru Outback are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 6. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 9.0 | 7.7 - 9.9 | |
|
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Outback. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 200 - 221 mm (7.9 - 8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Outback can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 6 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 512 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2076 litres | |
|
Subaru Outback has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1 metres more than that of the Subaru Outback, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`066 kg | ~ 2`115 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`509 kg | ~ 1`679 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 557 kg | ~ 436 kg | |
| Mazda 6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Subaru Outback. Therefore, Mazda 6 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Outback scores higher in safety tests. The Subaru Outback scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |