Mazda 6 2018 vs Skoda Octavia 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda 6 is available only with front wheel drive, while Skoda Octavia can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Skoda Octavia is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 - 250 HP | 110 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 - 445 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.1 seconds | 6.7 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 9.0 | 1.0 - 7.3 | |
|
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 6 is 19 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1555 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`066 kg | ~ 1`986 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`509 kg | ~ 1`399 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 557 kg | ~ 587 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Skoda Octavia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |