Mazda 6 2015 vs Mazda 6 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Mazda 6 2015 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 6 2012 can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.52.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 145 - 192 HP145 - 192 HP
Torque: 210 - 420 NM210 - 420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 - 10.2 seconds7.9 - 10.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 6.44.4 - 6.4
On average, the Mazda 6 2015 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda 6 2012. On average, Mazda 6 2015 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2012.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.80 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2015 and Mazda 6 2012 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 522 litres502 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1664 litresno data
Mazda 6 2015 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6 2012.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2015 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda 6 2012, which means Mazda 6 2015 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`074~ 2`038
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10 6007400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
Mazda 6 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv