Mazda 6 2015 vs Volvo V90 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Volvo V90 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 - 192 HP | 150 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 420 NM | 300 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | 5 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.4 | 2.0 - 7.4 | |
|
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V90. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 153 mm (6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 6 is 14 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1526 litres | |
| Mazda 6 has 38 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V90, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`074 | ~ 2`376 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |