Mazda 6 2015 vs Volvo V50 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 - 192 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 420 NM | 150 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | 6.9 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.4 | 5.0 - 10.1 | |
|
Mazda 6 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V50. On average, Mazda 6 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is larger. Mazda 6 is 28 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 522 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 105 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`074 | ~ 1`943 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |