Mazda 121 1996 vs Rover 200 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 50 HP | 103 HP | |
Torque: | 97 NM | 127 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 121 engine produces 53 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Mazda 121 reaches 100 km/h speed 8.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.1 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
700 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.83 m | 3.97 m | |
Width: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.32 m | 1.42 m | |
Mazda 121 is smaller. Mazda 121 is 14 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 121 is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 304 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1086 litres | |
Rover 200 has more luggage space. Mazda 121 has 54 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 121 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Mazda 121 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`480 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 121 has
|
Rover 200 has
| |