Mazda 121 1996 vs Renault Clio 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 121 engine produces 25 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Mazda 121 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.42 m | |
| Mazda 121 is 6 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 121 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
| Mazda 121 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 121 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Mazda 121 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Mazda 121 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 121, so Mazda 121 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 121 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |