Mazda 121 1996 vs Kia RIO 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Kia RIO is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 121 engine produces 25 HP less power than Kia RIO, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Kia RIO. Due to the lower power, Mazda 121 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 121 is smaller. Mazda 121 is 39 cm shorter than the Kia RIO, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 121 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 449 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1277 litres | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage space. Mazda 121 has 199 litres less trunk space than the Kia RIO. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 121 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia RIO, which means Mazda 121 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`471 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 121 has
|
Kia RIO has
| |