Mazda 121 1996 vs Skoda Felicia 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.4 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Felicia is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 121 engine produces 4 HP less power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Skoda Felicia. Due to the lower power, Mazda 121 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.4 | |
| Mazda 121 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that by driving the Mazda 121 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 121 is smaller. Mazda 121 is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 121 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 121 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Mazda 121 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Mazda 121 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 121, so Mazda 121 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 121 has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |