Mazda 121 1996 vs Rover 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.4 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 121 engine produces 26 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Mazda 121 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.6 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 121 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 121 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 121 is smaller. Mazda 121 is 14 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 121 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1086 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage space. Mazda 121 has 54 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 121 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Mazda 121 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 121 has
|
Rover 200 has
| |