Mazda 121 1996 vs Skoda Felicia 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Skoda Felicia is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 121 engine produces 8 HP less power than Skoda Felicia, but torque is 3 NM more than Skoda Felicia. Due to the lower power, Mazda 121 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.9 | |
| Mazda 121 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 121 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 121 is smaller. Mazda 121 is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 121 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 121 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Mazda 121 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`460 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mazda 121 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Felicia, so Mazda 121 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 121 has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |