Mazda 121 1996 vs Toyota Starlet 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.6 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Toyota Starlet is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 121 and Toyota Starlet have the same engine power, but Mazda 121 torque is 5 NM less than Toyota Starlet. Mazda 121 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.8 | |
|
The Mazda 121 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 121 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Starlet, which means that by driving the Mazda 121 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 121 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.40 m | |
| Mazda 121 is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Starlet, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 121 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 121 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Starlet. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Starlet has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 121 has serious deffects in 190 percent more cases than Toyota Starlet, so Toyota Starlet quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 121 has
|
Toyota Starlet has
| |