Mazda 121 1996 vs Suzuki Baleno 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 96 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 121 engine produces 21 HP less power than Suzuki Baleno, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Suzuki Baleno. Due to the lower power, Mazda 121 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.3 | |
|
The Mazda 121 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 121 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that by driving the Mazda 121 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Suzuki Baleno gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda 121 is smaller. Mazda 121 is 7 cm shorter than the Suzuki Baleno, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 121 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 121 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno, which means Mazda 121 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Suzuki Baleno has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 121 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Suzuki Baleno, so Suzuki Baleno quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 121 has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |