Mazda 121 1996 vs Rover 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 121 engine produces 28 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Mazda 121 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 121 is smaller. Mazda 121 is 14 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 121 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1086 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage space. Mazda 121 has 54 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 121 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Mazda 121 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 121 has
|
Rover 200 has
| |