Mazda 121 1996 vs Ford KA 1997

 
Mazda 121
1996 - 2000
Ford KA
1997 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP60 HP
Torque: 110 NM105 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 seconds15.4 seconds
Mazda 121 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 121 engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford KA, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Ford KA. Thanks to more power Mazda 121 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.16.7
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Ford KA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 121 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 121 could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 121 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
710 km on highway760 km on highway
580 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption
Ford KA gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.83 m3.62 m
Width: 1.63 m1.63 m
Height: 1.32 m1.37 m
Mazda 121 is 21 cm longer than the Ford KA, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 121 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres186 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data724 litres
Mazda 121 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 121 has 64 litres more trunk space than the Ford KA.
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 121 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford KA.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4351`265
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Mazda 121 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 121, so Mazda 121 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 600800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 121 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford KA has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv