Mazda 121 1996 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.8 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 75 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 - 110 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 - 19 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 7.1 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Mazda 121 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Mazda 121 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 121 is smaller. Mazda 121 is 54 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 121 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Mazda 121 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 121 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Mazda 121 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`455 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 121 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |