Mazda 121 1996 vs Rover 200 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.8 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 75 HP | 75 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 - 110 NM | 117 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 - 19 seconds | 7.5 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 7.1 | 5.6 - 7.8 | |
|
Mazda 121 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Rover 200. On average, Mazda 121 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 121 is smaller. Mazda 121 is 14 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 121 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1086 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage space. Mazda 121 has 54 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 121 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Mazda 121 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`455 | ~ 1`527 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 121 has
|
Rover 200 has
| |