Mazda 121 1996 vs Renault Clio 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.8 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 75 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 - 110 NM | 93 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 - 19 seconds | 9.6 - 15.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 7.1 | 5.2 - 7.6 | |
|
Mazda 121 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Mazda 121 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.42 m | |
| Mazda 121 is 6 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 121 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
| Mazda 121 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 121 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Mazda 121 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`455 | ~ 1`498 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 121 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |