Lexus GS 2007 vs Kia Optima 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 274 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Lexus GS engine produces 25 HP less power than Kia Optima, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Kia Optima. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 8.8 | |
|
The Kia Optima is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus GS consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus GS could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Kia Optima gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Kia Optima) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Lexus GS) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Sorento, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Optima might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Lexus GS engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus GS is 3 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus GS is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 436 litres | |
| Lexus GS has 6 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus GS is 1.4 metres less than that of the Kia Optima, which means Lexus GS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`125 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus GS has
|
Kia Optima has
| |