Lexus GS 2016 vs Jaguar XF 2019
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Hybrid | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Lexus GS) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Jaguar XF), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 181 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Lexus GS engine produces 119 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 479 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Lexus GS reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.4 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 11.20 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1470 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| Lexus GS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 116 mm (4.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Lexus GS can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Lexus GS version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 885 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Lexus GS has 82 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus GS is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Lexus GS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`235 kg | 2`390 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`770 kg | 1`803 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 465 kg | 587 kg | |
| Lexus GS load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem less than Jaguar XF. Therefore, Jaguar XF is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus GS has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |