Lexus GS 2015 vs Mercedes C class 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 241 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Lexus GS engine produces 57 HP more power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mercedes C class. Thanks to more power Lexus GS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 5.6 | |
|
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus GS consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus GS could require 525 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 92 mm (3.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Lexus GS can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Lexus GS version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus IS, Lexus RX, Lexus NX | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase, Mercedes B klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mercedes C klase 2013 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes C klase 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Lexus GS is larger. Lexus GS is 19 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 3 cm wider, while the height of Lexus GS is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Lexus GS uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.22 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus GS is 0.020000000000001 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`250 kg | 2`030 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`726 kg | 1`465 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 524 kg | 565 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 27 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus GS has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |