Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Land Rover Freelander 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander 2003 engine produces 27 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander 2010. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 7.2 | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander 2003 consumes 5.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander 2003 could require 780 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Freelander 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander 2003 is smaller. Land Rover Freelander 2003 is 8 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander 2010, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander 2003 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 755 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 6400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |