Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 17 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 10.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Rover 75, Kia Carnival, Rover 400 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.62 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |