Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Ford Maverick 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Maverick is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Ford Maverick. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 12.8 | |
| Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander is 3 cm longer than the Ford Maverick, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 985 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`145 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Maverick has
| |