Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 58 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 113 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.85 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 2`800 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Land Rover Freelander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Land Rover Freelander, so Land Rover Freelander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 12 400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |