Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 17 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander is 5 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1951 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Land Rover Freelander, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |