Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 33 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 22 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Land Rover Freelander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Land Rover Freelander, so Land Rover Freelander quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |