Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 33 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 22 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Land Rover Freelander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Land Rover Freelander, so Land Rover Freelander quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |