Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 23 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander is 5 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1951 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Land Rover Freelander, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |