Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Toyota RAV4 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 19 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Accord, Rover 25, Rover 45 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2001 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota RAV4 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 18 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 260 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |