Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Skoda Fabia 2000

 
Land Rover Freelander
1998 - 2000
Skoda Fabia
2000 - 2004
Body: Crossover / SUVHatchback
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 97 HP64 HP
Torque: 210 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.6 seconds17.9 seconds
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive.
Land Rover Freelander engine produces 33 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.74.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.6 l/100km4.9 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 435 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway1120 km on highway
770 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m3.96 m
Width: 1.80 m1.65 m
Height: 1.76 m1.45 m
Land Rover Freelander is larger.
Land Rover Freelander is 42 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 31 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1015 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`610
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 16001000
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Freelander has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv