Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander 1998 engine produces 15 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander 2000, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Freelander 2000. Despite less power, Land Rover Freelander 1998 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander 1998 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander 1998 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 2000, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander 1998 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander 1998 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander 1998 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander 2000 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Accord, Rover 25, Rover 45 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander 1998 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander 1998 and Land Rover Freelander 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |