Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Suzuki Vitara 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 23 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 525 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Accord, Rover 25, Rover 45 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 21 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |