Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 12 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 18 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 330 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |