Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 363 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 123 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 153 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 14.5 | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 6.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1020 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Accord, Rover 25, Rover 45 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is smaller, but slightly higher. Land Rover Freelander is 26 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |